Keywords: anti-vaccinators, labelling, manipulation, COVID-19, linguistic pragmatics, implication


Modern society is full of contradictions and struggles for public opinion, which creates preconditions for the use of a wide range of strategies, tactics and means of manipulation. The article focuses on the analysis of one of the manipulative strategies – "labelling" the opponent of political confrontation in order to emphasize its otherness and achieve certain political goals. The strategy and the verbal means of its expression aim at the speaker's selfapproval and self-expression of a certain ideology via humiliating others. The politicized topic of confrontation between vaccinators and anti-vaccinators is the matter of investigation, where the anti-vaccinators are marked as the group "we"; it allows a deeper understanding of its manipulative principles and cognitive differences with the group "others" as well as analyzing means of stipulating this confrontation. The first step of the investigation was to find out what subjective traits the anti-vaccinators saw in their opponents: it allowed to create a list of markers of the group "other" in contrast to the group "we" – anti-vaccinators. This list is a result of the analysis of discursive strategies of the opponent's dehumanization and demonization, i.e. of attributing him animalistic traits or traits of omnipotence and permissiveness that is difficult to overcome. As a result of lingual-pragmatic analysis, the structure of the group "others", their purpose and means of achieving it were identified. It was found out that the language and speech implementation of the strategy of "labelling" occurs at all levels: lexical, morphological, and syntactic. Cognitive associations implied in lexemes are widely used, which arouses the most uncivilized moods and contribute to inciting social tension, national intolerance, and so on. The analysis is based on modern Englishlanguage articles from publications in on-line media that adhere to professional ethics and journalistic standards.


1. Vodak, R. (1997) Yazyk. Diskurs. Politika [Language. Discourse. Politics]. Volgograd: Peremena. (In Rus.).
2. Vusyk, H. M., Antoniuk, O. V. (2020) Suchasnyi politychnyi dyskurs yak obiekt linhvistychnykh doslidzhen [Modern Political Discourse as an Object of Linguistic Research] 9269/9213 (In Ukr.).
3. Kondratenko, N. (2017) Typolohiia movlennievykh zhanriv ukrainskoho politychnoho dyskursu [Typology of Speech Genres in Ukrainian Political Discourse] Studia Philologica, 2 (9) index.php/journal/article/view/223 (In Ukr.).
4. Sheigal, E. Y. (2000) Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of Political Discourse]. M., Volgograd: Peremena, (In Rus.).
5. Baldi, B., Franco, L. (2015) (De)legitimization strategies in the 'Austere Prose' of Palmiro Togliatti. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali. Working Papers in Linguistics and Oriental Studies, 1, pp. 139–158.
6. Bernáth, G., Messing, V. (2011) Pushed to the Edge. Research Report on the Representation of Roma Communities in the Hungarian Majority Media. CPS Working Papers. Central European University: Budapest, pp. 35–41.
7. Dieckmann, W. (2005) Streiten über das Streiten: normative Grundlagen polemischer Metakommunikation. Max Niemeyer Verlag GmbH, Tübingen. (In Germ.)
8. Kovarek, D., Róna, D., Hunyadi, B. and Krekó, P. (2019) ScapegoatBased Policy Making in Hungary: Qualitative Evidence for How Jobbik and its Mayors Govern Municipalities Intersections. EEJSP. 3(3), pp. 63–87. intersections/article/view/382
9. Lakoff, R.T. (1990) Talking Power: The Politics of Language. N.Y.: Basic Books.
10. Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2019) Labeling and mislabeling in American political discourse: a survey based on insights of independent media monitors. and_Mislabeling_in_American_Political_Discourse
11. Moncrieffe, J. (2004) Labelling, power and accountability: How and why our categories matter. The Power of Labelling. J. Moncrieffe and R. Eyben (Eds.). London: Routledge.
12. Schelling, Th. C. (1980) The strategy of conflict. Harvard: University Press.
13. Tileagă, C. (2007) Ideologies of moral exclusion: A critical discursive reframing of depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, pp. 717–737.
14. Aaronovitch, D. (2021). Antivaxers are in danger of becoming a cult
15. Diamond, R. (2021). Kids' Сovid vaccines are on the way. Parents, don't let anti-vax propaganda fool you lifestyle/2021/05/04/kids-covid-vaccines-anti-vax-propaganda/
16. Dugan, E., Gadher D. (2021). He was made an OBE for youth work. Now he peddles anti-lockdown lies
17. Sun, L. H. Brittain, A. (2021). Meet the New York couple donating millions to the anti-vax movement health-science/meet-the-new-york-couple-donating-millions-to-the-anti-vaxmovement/2019/06/18/9d791bcc-8e28-11e9-b08e-cfd89bd36d4e_story.html
18. Watson, J. (2021). Covid in Scotland: anti-vaxer email despicable, says Care Scotland boss
19. Yeomans, E. (2021). NHS staff join anti‑vax group article/coronavirus-nhs-staff-flock-to-anti-vax-group-k8sq7q63w
How to Cite
Sazonova, Y. (2022). THE OPPONENT THROUGH THE ANTI-VACCINATORS’ EYES: THE LINGUISTIC DIMENSION OF THE MANIPULATIVE STRATEGY OF LABELLING : DOI: Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Literary Studies. Linguistics. Folklore Studies, (1(31), 70-74. Retrieved from